1: Vermont
Leman:
In part 0 I put Vermont in 9th place. I might have been a little bit wrong. When I played against them they had a solid settling record and a decently competent early game ai that parlayed into a powerful midgame food boost with their unique Maple bonus resource. They had a reasonable amount of space to settle in Quebec, which itself is fairly defensible.
Now, I know that my set of mods and rules isn’t the exact same set of mods and rules as CBRs, and I know that every game has outliers (see Timor-Leste and Mohave), but god damn am I disappointed in you Vermont. Like. It’s one thing to play like Greenland, who just you know, fucked up the early game, but still is trying but Vermont just like, didn’t play the god-damn game? Like there were a dozen civs that decided to just like settle two cities and chill this time, I know but Vermont was the only one I personally had high hopes for. I don’t know why? It feels like there were more civs this time around that sort of sat on two or three cities for a while. My theory is that the larger space required between cities made it harder for some ais to find good settling spots early on. (Vermont is just trash) But still! Gokturks, Timor-Leste, and Mohave all managed to come back from slow starts! They just, you know, did something afterwards
That’s an excuse for the slow settling but that’s not the start of Vermont’s absolute trash-tier play. They gave up Montpelier for literally nothing. They founded Burlington on Iceland, not in Quebec where they should have. They might have given that city up for free too. Or lost it. It was indefensible anyways. I don’t remember, and by then I was too mad at Vermont to care.
Then they died. 50th place. That’s it. For a civ that I thought was gonna be top 10. I’m upset. Vermont sucked. I’m glad they’re gone.
No comments yet.